skip banner Southern Forest Resource Assessment    Draft Report


Search this site:

 

Home > Draft Report > SOCIO-3   

Previous PageNext Page

Table 2--Features and accomplishments of State forestry cost-sharing programs to improve timber production

State Programs


Cost-share rate


Maximum payment


Site productivity ranking


Ownership limits


Project limits


 

Percent


Dollars


 

Acres


Acres


Alabama Agricultural And Conservation Development Program


60


3,500/ year


No


20 minimum


1
minimum


Louisiana Forest Productivity Program


50


10,000/ year


No


None


None


Mississippi Forest Resources Development Program


50-75


5,000/ year


No


None


None


North Carolina Forest Development Program


40-60


None


No


None


1 minimum 100 maximum


South Carolina Forest Renewal Act


40


None


Yes


None


100 maximum


Tennessee Reforestation Incentives


50


5,000/ year


Yes erodible lands


None


None


Texas Reforestation Foundation Program


50


None


Yes


1000 maximum


10 minimum


Virginia Reforestation Timberlands Act


40


75/
acres


No


None


1-5 minimum 500 maximum


Return to first reference in text


Return to second reference in text


Return to third reference in text


Previous PageNext Page

Glossary | Sci.Names | Process | Comments | Final Report

 

content: James E. Granskog and Terry K. Haines
webmaster: John M. Pye

created: 21-NOV-2001