Comparison of Available Soil Nitrogen Assays in Control and Burned Forested Sites

  • Authors: Knoepp, Jennifer D.; Swank, Wayne T.
  • Publication Year: 1995
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Soil Science Society of America Journal Volume 59, no.6, November-December 1995. 5p.

Abstract

The existence of several different methods for measuring net Nmineralization and nitrilkation rates and indexing N availability has raised questions about the comparability of these methods. We compared in situ covered cores, in situ buried bags, aerobic laboratory incubations, and tension lysimetry on control and treated plots of a prescribed burn experiment in the southern Appalachians. Environmental influences were examined with soil moisture and temperature measurements. All methods detected significant differences in net N mineralization rates between treated and control plots; P = 0.04, 0.007,0.001, and 0.07 for covered cores, buried bags, lab incubations, and lysimeters, respectively. Mean rates of N mineralization during the growing season were similar for the three soil incubation methods. The laboratory incubation of soil from treated plots produced significantly greater potential nitrification rates than the in situ methods. The four methods were not well correlated; this indicates the need for caution when comparing N transformation data derived from different methods. We conclude that the in situ covered core method is superior because it best incorporates site-specific soil temperature and moisture changes into N transformation measurements. 1990; Hart and Firestone, 1989; Hill and Shackleton, 1989). However, these comparisons were limited by the number of methods tested or by the sites on which they were tested.

  • Citation: Knoepp, Jennifer D.; Swank, Wayne T. 1995. Comparison of Available Soil Nitrogen Assays in Control and Burned Forested Sites. Soil Science Society of America Journal Volume 59, no.6, November-December 1995. 5p.
  • Posted Date: April 1, 1980
  • Modified Date: August 22, 2006
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.