Financial returns under uncertainty for conventional and reduced-impact logging in permanent production forests of the Brazilian Amazon

Download
(PDF; 129 KB)
Cite
Feedback
  • Authors: Boltz, Frederick; Carter, Douglas R.; Holmes, Thomas P.; Pereira, Rodrigo
  • Publication Year: 2001
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Ecological Economics 39 (2001) 387-398

Abstract

Reduced-impact logging (RIL) techniques are designed to improve the efficiency of timber harvesting while mitigating its adverse effects on the forest ecosystem. Research on RIL in select tropical forest regions has demonstrated clear ecological benefits relative to conventional logging (CL) practices while the financial competitiveness of RIL is less conclusive. We conduct a comparative analysis of financial returns to one and two cutting-cycle logging entries for representative RIL and CL operations of the eastern Amazon. Observed variability in harvest efficiency and uncertainties of forest productivity are introduced in a stochastic simulation of future biological and financial returns to the alternative logging systems. Despite the perceived investment risks, RIL harvesting operations generate competitive or superior returns relative to CL for a wide range of discount rates due to gains in harvest efficiency and forest conservation.

  • Citation: Boltz, Frederick; Carter, Douglas R.; Holmes, Thomas P.; Pereira, Rodrigo, Jr. 2001. Financial returns under uncertainty for conventional and reduced-impact logging in permanent production forests of the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics 39 (2001) 387-398
  • Keywords: Amazon, Logging, Tropical forest, Sustainable management, Risk
  • Posted Date: April 1, 1980
  • Modified Date: August 22, 2006

    • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.