Impacts of Insect Defoliation in Cottonwood Plantations in Mississippi

This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document here.

  • Authors: Leininger, Theodor D.; Schiff, Nathan M.; Henne-Kerr, Jackie
  • Publication Year: 2004
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–71. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 138-141

Abstract

In spring 2001, a notodontid moth, Gluphisia septentrionis Wlkr., defoliated about 2,000 acres of 9- and 10- year-old eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) trees in west central Mississippi. The farm manager had never seen cottonwood defoliated by that species of moth, because it was not considered a pest in Mississippi. When the trees leafed out again, cottonwood leaf beetles (Chrysomela scripta F.) attacked them. In order to avoid two defoliations by mid-season, the manager applied an insecticide. Cottonwood leaf beetles commonly attack young Populus but seldom require treatment in trees > 2 years old. However, this defoliation by the Gluphisia moth caused a flush of leaves in mid-season when cottonwood leaf beetle populations were high. Cottonwood growth is indeterminate, so the timing of insect defoliations can have a variety of effects on growth and energy storage. In spring 2002, G. septentrionis larvae were present in the same stands and again caused defoliation. This paper considers tree mortality and growth after 2 years of defoliation, as well as some associated economic effects.

  • Citation: Leininger, Theodor D.; Schiff, Nathan M.; Henne-Kerr, Jackie 2004. Impacts of Insect Defoliation in Cottonwood Plantations in Mississippi. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–71. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 138-141
  • Posted Date: April 1, 1980
  • Modified Date: August 22, 2006
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.