The costs and benefits of certification for community forests managed by traditional peoples in south-eastern Tanzania

  • Authors: Frey, Gregory; Charnley, Susan; Makala, Jasper
  • Publication Year: 2022
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: International Forestry Review

Abstract

Community forests managed by indigenous, traditional, and local communities must be environmentally, socially, and economically sustainable for their benefits to persist. Certification of community forests communicates that products harvested there meet these standards. However, certification of community forests has been limited, particularly in Africa. Financial analysis, review of audit reports, and a survey of forest managers were used to explore monetary and non-monetary social costs and benefits of Forest Stewardship Council certification for 14 timberproducing community forests managed by traditional peoples in south-eastern Tanzania. Direct monetary costs of certification outweighed monetary benefits, threatening economic sustainability. Nevertheless, forest managers believed that community forests should retain certification because they valued its non-monetary benefits, which were consistent with the Forest Stewardship Council’s social principles. This study demonstrates that certification of community forests can help indigenous and traditional peoples ensure safe working conditions, strengthen forest tenure rights, sustain multiple community benefits, and protect culturally-important sites, however, financial barriers persist.

  • Citation: Frey, G. E., Charnley, S., Makala, J. 2022. The costs and benefits of certification for community forests managed by traditional peoples in south-eastern Tanzania. International Forestry Review. 23(3/S1): 360-379.
  • Keywords: Forest Stewardship Council, community forest enterprise, tropical forestry, financial analysis, perceptions
  • Posted Date: January 13, 2022
  • Modified Date: September 27, 2022
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.