Effects of controlled drainage on the hydrology of drained pine plantations in the North Carolina coastal plain

  • Authors: Amatya, Devendra M.; Skaggs, R.W.; Gregory, J.D.
  • Publication Year: 1996
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Journal of Hydrology

Abstract

This paper presents results of a 5 year study to characterize the hydrology (rainfall, interception, evapotranspiration (ET), soil water storage, drainage rate, lateral seepage, and water table fluctuations) of three identical drained, pine-forested watersheds in Carteret County, North Carolina. During the 2 year calibration period (1988-1989) all three watersheds were operated in conventional drainage mode with the weirs in the outlet ditch approximately 1.0 m below the soil surface. About 17% of the total rainfall was intercepted and subsequently evaporated and 53% was removed by transpiration and evaporation from the soil during this period. Drainage removed about 28% and the remaining 3% was lost by lateral seepage. During the 3 year controlled drainage treatment period (1990-1993), drainage in Watershed 2, managed for tree growth, was reduced to 21% of gross rainfall as compared with 30.5% for Watershed 1 under free drainage. Watershed 3, managed to minimize offsite impacts, yielded 26% of gross rainfall as drainage. Interception loss accounted for about 14.5% of the gross rainfall. ET amounts computed as the residual in a water balance, were 50%, 60%, and 55% of total rainfall for Watersheds 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The effects of controlled drainage on water table depths, drainage and ET were demonstrated for seasonal and year-to-year variation in rainfall. The controlled drainage treatments affected both drainage volumes and daily peak outflow rates. The treatment in Watershed 3 was more effective in reducing peak outflow rates.

  • Citation: Amatya, Devendra M.; Skaggs, R.W.; Gregory, J.D. 1996. Effects of controlled drainage on the hydrology of drained pine plantations in the North Carolina coastal plain. Journal of Hydrology. 181: 211-232.
  • Posted Date: February 9, 2022
  • Modified Date: February 9, 2022
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.