Making sense out of confusion: a review of fire-oak paper published in the past 50 years

This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document here.

  • Authors: Brose, Patrick H.; Waldrop, Thomas A.
  • Publication Year: 2014
  • Publication Series: Proceedings - Paper (PR-P)
  • Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-199. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 208p


The existing fire-oak literature is contradictory on whether fire helps or hinders the oak regeneration process. This confusion occurs because the fire-oak studies have been conducted under a wide variety of conditions. In this paper, we review the fire-oak literature by stand age class, season of burn, and number of burns to identify commonalities and trends. Overall, prescribed fire reduces the density of small diameter stems in the midstory, preferentially selects for oak reproduction and against mesophytic hardwood reproduction, equalizes the height growth rates between these two species groups, and promotes the establishment of new oak seedlings. Generally, prescribed burning provides the most benefit to oak reproduction when the fires occur during the growing season and several years after a substantial reduction in overstory density. Single fires conducted in closed-canopy stands have little impact in the short term, but multiple burns eventually do benefit oaks in the long term, especially when followed by a canopy disturbance

  • Citation: Brose, Patrick H.; Waldrop, Thomas A. 2014. Making sense out of confusion: a review of fire-oak paper published in the past 50 years. In: Waldrop, Thomas A., ed. Proceedings, Wildland fire in the Appalachians: discussions among fire managers and scientists.
  • Posted Date: March 8, 2021
  • Modified Date: May 4, 2021
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.