Sample-size needs for forestry herbicide trials

  • Authors: Zedaker, S.M.; Gregoire, T.G.; Miller, James H.
  • Publication Year: 1994
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23(10): 2153-2158.


Forest herbicide experiments are increasingly being designed to evaluate smaller treatment differences when comparing existing effective treatments, tank mix ratios, surfactants, and new low-rate products. The ability to detect small differences in efficacy is dependent upon the relationship among sample size. type I and II error probabilities, and the coefficients of variation of the efficacy data The common sources of variation in efficacy measurements and design considerations for controlling variation ate reviewed, while current shortcomings are clarified. A summary of selected trials estimates that coefficients of variation often range between 25 and 100%, making the number of observations necessary to detect small differences very large, especially when the power of the test (1 - ß) is considered. Very often the power of the test has been ignored when designing experiments because of the difficulty in calculating ß. An available program for microcomputers is introduced that allows researchers to examine relationships among sample size, effect size, and coefftcients of variation for specified designs, a and ß. This program should aid investigators in planning studies that optimize experimental power to detect anticipated effect sizes within resource constraints.

  • Citation: Zedaker, S.M.; Gregoire, T.G.; Miller, James H. 1994. Sample-size needs for forestry herbicide trials. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23(10): 2153-2158.
  • Posted Date: April 1, 1980
  • Modified Date: August 22, 2006
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.