Effects of site preparation on timber and non-timber values of loblolly pine plantations

  • Authors: Gan, Jianbang; Kolison, Stephen H.; Miller, James H.; Hargrove, Tasha M.
  • Publication Year: 1998
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Forest Ecology and Management. 107: 47-53.

Abstract

This study evaluated the timber and non-timber values of the forest stands generated by four site preparation methods tested in the Tuskegee National Forest 15 yr earlier. The timber values of the forest stands were assessed with the timber yields predicted by the SE TWIGS model. Non-timber benefits were evaluated through the Contingent Valuation Method. Two hundred residents randomly selected from three counties surrounding or near the National Forest were interviewed. The survey results indicate that the majority (62%) of the respondents felt that the National Forest should be managed for both timber and non-timber products. Of the four site preparation methods, the soil-active herbicide method was projected to produce the highest timber value. For non-timber benefits. the respondents preferred the forest stand without site preparation to those generated using chainsaw felling. soil-active herbicide, and tree injection methods. When both timber and non-timber values are considered, no site preparation is in general the best aliemative that seems to meet the desires of the various groups of citizens with different or even conflicting preferences over timber and non-timber products.

  • Citation: Gan, Jianbang; Kolison, Stephen H., Jr.; Miller, James H.; Hargrove, Tasha M. 1998. Effects of site preparation on timber and non-timber values of loblolly pine plantations. Forest Ecology and Management. 107: 47-53.
  • Keywords: Economic analysis, Contingent valuation, Multi-attribute assessment, National forest, Regeneration
  • Posted Date: April 1, 1980
  • Modified Date: April 30, 2007
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.