Comparison of four harvesting systems in a loblolly pine plantation

  • Authors: Klepac, J.; Mitchell, Dana
  • Publication Year: 2016
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Professional Agricultural Workers Journal


Felling and skidding operations were monitored while clearcut harvesting a 12-acre area of a 14-year old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantation. The study area contained 465 trees per acre for trees 2.0 inches Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) and larger with a Quadratic Mean Diameter (QMD) of 7.26 inches. Two feller-bunchers (tracked and rubber-tired) and two skidders (conventional and large capacity) were paired to create four different harvesting systems which were randomly assigned to 3-acre units for evaluation of production rates and costs. Each system was balanced to determine the number of machines needed to minimize the cost of producing each ton of wood. Cost from woods to landing ranged from $1.92/ton to $3.16/ton. The two systems that incorporated the large capacity skidder performed better, and at a lower cost per ton, than the systems that used the conventional skidder.

  • Citation: Klepac, John; Mitchell, Dana 2016. Comparison of four harvesting systems in a loblolly pine plantation. Professional Agricultural Workers Journal: 4(1): 9-23.
  • Keywords: Productivity, Cost, Felling , Skidding, Biomass Harvesting
  • Posted Date: October 3, 2017
  • Modified Date: October 4, 2017
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.