Financial and Economic Analysis of Reduced Impact Logging

  • Authors: Holmes, Tom
  • Publication Year: 2016
  • Publication Series: Book Chapter
  • Source: In:Tropical Forestry Handbook (2nd edition), L Pancel and M Kohl (editors), Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands


Concern regarding extensive damage to tropical forests resulting from logging increased dramatically after World War II when mechanized logging systems developed in industrialized countries were deployed in the tropics. As a consequence, tropical foresters began developing logging procedures that were more environmentally benign, and by the 1990s, these practices began to be described as reduced impact logging” (RIL) systems. As scientific evidence accumulated demonstrating that RIL techniques could substantially reduce logging impacts on the residual forest relative to conventional logging (CL), attention turned to understanding the financial conditions under which logging firms would choose to implement RIL. While most studies conducted in Latin America show that RIL is financially competitive or superior to CL, research in Southeast Asia and Africa suggests that economic incentives will likely be required to induce logging firms to adopt RIL. One approach that appears promising to promote better logging practices in the tropics is to offer payments for the incremental carbon retained by RIL systems.

  • Citation: Holmes, Thomas P. 2016, Financial and economic analysis of reduced impact logging. In:Tropical Forestry Handbook (2nd edition), L Pancel and M Kohl (editors), Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.  15 p.
  • Keywords: Bio-economic models; Carbon payments; Forest damage; Forest resilience; Sustainable tropical forest management
  • Posted Date: September 8, 2016
  • Modified Date: October 3, 2016
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.