Predicting logging residue volumes in the Pacific Northwest

  • Authors: Berg, Erik C.; Morgan, Todd A.; Simmons, Eric A.; Zarnoch, Stan; Scudder, Micah G.
  • Publication Year: 2016
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Forest Science
  • DOI: 10.5849/forsci.15-176


Pacific Northwest forest managers seek estimates of post-timber-harvest woody residue volumes and biomass that can be related to readily available site- and tree-level attributes. To better predict residue production, researchers investigated variability in residue ratios, growing-stock residue volume per mill-delivered volume, across Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington. This project presented unique sample design challenges, and the authors adopted model-based sampling to calculate the growing-stock logging residue ratio for the four-state region and produced models that relate the residue ratio to individual tree- and stand-level variables meaningful to land managers. The regionwide residue ratio was 0.0269, i.e., 26.9 ft3 of growing-stock logging residue per 1,000 ft3 (26.9 m3 per 1,000 m3) of mill-delivered volume. Residue ratios were related to tree- and site-level variables with predictive models. Residue ratios were predicted to increase with larger small-end used diameter and decline exponentially with increasing dbh. Ratios were predicted to drop when pulp logs were removed and when timber was mechanically felled. Results from this study could be used to produce or improve residue prediction tools for land managers.

  • Citation: Berg, Erik C.; Morgan, Todd A.; Simmons, Eric A.; Zarnoch, Stanley J.; Scudder, Micah G. 2016. Predicting logging residue volumes in the Pacific Northwest. Forest Science, 62:000-000.
  • Keywords: growing-stock removals, residue ratio, timber harvest
  • Posted Date: August 18, 2016
  • Modified Date: September 1, 2020
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.