Restoration of longleaf pine--the status of our knowledge

This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document here.

  • Authors: Guldin, Jim; Rosson, James F.; Nelson, C. Dana
  • Publication Year: 2016
  • Publication Series: Proceedings - Paper (PR-P)
  • Source: In: Proceedings of the 18th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-212. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 614 p.


By the fifth anniversary of the America’s Longleaf Restoration Initiative in 2014, the decline in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris L.) appears to have been reversed. The area in longleaf pine-dominated stands currently exceeds 4 million acres, up from a low of about 3 million acres two decades ago. A major contribution to this reversal has been the recent establishment of more than 500,000 acres of longleaf pine plantations. However, the plantation approach has limitations in an environment where stand establishment costs exceed $300 per acre, when large-diameter sawlogs currently bring stumpage prices of $30 per ton or less, and when the most urgently-needed habitat is found in mature stands with well-developed understory flora. In addition, expanding the restoration of planted longleaf pine stands will require excluding hybrid Sonderegger pines (P. ×sondereggeri H.H. Chapm.) from longleaf pine seed orchards and nurseries, and developing silvicultural tactics for sustainable and lucrative pine straw harvests or other local niche markets. A broader and more inclusive approach to restoration might include identifying mixed-pine and pine-hardwood stands with a minor manageable longleaf pine component. Evidence from State surveys and FIA data suggests that such stands could add several million acres of restorable longleaf pine stands across the South. The silvicultural tactics in these stands are simple—harvest the non-longleaf pine component and restore prescribed burning. Not only would this bring an early economic return to the landowner, it would more quickly restore habitat conditions for the flora and fauna of interest in longleaf pine ecosystems. If the approach is feasible, expanding the use of prescribed fire on private lands will become more important, and perhaps more problematic, in restoration of longleaf pine ecosystems.

  • Citation: Guldin, James M.; Rosson, Jr., James F.; Nelson, C. Dana. 2016. Restoration of longleaf pine--the status of our knowledge. In: Schweitzer, Callie Jo; Clatterbuck, Wayne K.; Oswalt, Christopher M., eds. Proceedings of the 18th biennial southern silvicultural research conference conference; 2015 March 2-5; Knoxville, TN. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-212. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station: 323-331.
  • Keywords: longleaf pine, Pinus palustris, restoration, prescribed fire
  • Posted Date: March 31, 2016
  • Modified Date: January 22, 2021
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.