The silvicultural implications of age patterns in two southern pine stands after 72 years of uneven-aged management


A randomized sample of 250 loblolly (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf (Pinus echinata Mill.) pine ring counts was collected from the Good and Poor Farm Forestry compartments on the Crossett Experimental Forest. These mature, pine-dominated stands have been managed using uneven-aged silviculture since 1937. Our sample shows that both of these compartments have many different age classes although few distinct cohorts. Over the decades, pine recruitment followed the dozens of timber harvests and occasional natural mortality events (e.g., lightning strikes, ice storms, windthrow, insects, and disease). After more than 70 years of active management, only 5% of the overstory pines are shortleaf and about 6% of all pines originated before the imposition of uneven-aged silviculture. The age structure of these stands can be used to adapt conventional silvicultural treatments. For example, a wide range of ages was found in the sawtimber size classes, indicating that productivity improvements are still possible. The data also suggest that it may be possible to modify current practices to alter the age structure to favor other kinds of ecosystem services (e.g., wildlife habitat).

  • Citation: Bragg, Don C.; Guldin, James M. 2014. The silvicultural implications of age patterns in two southern pine stands after 72 years of uneven-aged management. Forest Science. 61(1): 176-182.
  • Keywords: Crossett Experimental Forest, loblolly, shortleaf, stand structure
  • Posted Date: April 11, 2014
  • Modified Date: January 25, 2021
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.