Review of nitrogen fate models applicable to forest landscapes in the Southern U.S.

  • Authors: Amatya, D. M.; Rossi, C. G.; Saleh, A.; Dai, Z.; Youssef, M. A.; Williams, R. G.; Bosch, D. D.; Chescheir, G. M.; Sun, G.; Skaggs, R. W.; Trettin, C. C.; Vance, E. D.; Nettles, J. E.; Tian, S.
  • Publication Year: 2013
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 56(5):1731-1757

Abstract

Assessing the environmental impacts of fertilizer nitrogen (N) used to increase productivity in managed forests is complex due to a wide range of abiotic and biotic factors affecting its forms and movement. Models developed to predict fertilizer N fate (e.g., cycling processes) and water quality impacts vary widely in their design, scope, and potential application. We review the applicability of five commonly used eco-hydrologic models (APEX, MIKESHE-DNDC, DRAINMOD- FOREST, REMM, and SWAT) in assessing N fate and transport in southern forest landscapes (<50 km²) because of their comprehensiveness and multi-scale predictions. The field-scale models DRAINMOD-FOREST and REMM contain process-level components characterizing hydrology, forest growth, and N dynamics, but they have limited capability to describe transport processes at the landscape scale. APEX can describe hydrology, forest growth, N fate processes, and plant competition at the landscape and small watershed scales mostly for upland. SWAT is best suited to hydrologic simulations at watershed scale (>50 km²), although N routing below the subbasin level does not yet exist. Similarly, the distributed MIKESHE-DNDC model has been used to assess N cycles across different spatial scales, on both uplands and lowlands, but was not intended to model lateral N transport. However, MIKESHE alone is capable of describing the hydrology and N transport. The strengths of each of the models reflect their original design and scope intent. Based on this review, none of the five models that we considered is independently adequate to address the fate of N fertilizers applied to forest stands at both small and large scales, including uplands and lowlands. While efforts are underway to extend these tools’ capabilities and address their various limitations, the models must be validated using experimental data before using their outputs, together with uncertainty analysis, for developing forest fertilization guidelines and the fate and transport of N.

  • Citation: Amatya, D. M.; Rossi, C. G.; Saleh, A.; Dai, Z.; Youssef, M. A.; Williams, R. G.; Bosch, D. D.; Chescheir, G. M.; Sun, G.; Skaggs, R. W.; Trettin, C. C.; Vance, E. D.; Nettles, J. E.; Tian, S. 2013. Review of nitrogen fate models applicable to forest landscapes in the Southern U.S. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 56(5):1731-1757.
  • Keywords: APEX, C:N ratio, DRAINMOD-FOREST, Hydrologic processes, In-stream process, MIKESHE-DNDC, Nitrogen transport, Productivity, REMM, SWAT
  • Posted Date: December 9, 2013
  • Modified Date: April 24, 2015
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.