U.S. Policy and Canadian Lumber: Effects of the 1986 Memorandum of Understanding

  • Authors: Wear, David N.; Lee, Karen J.
  • Publication Year: 1993
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Forest Science, Vol. 39, No. 4, November 1993 pp. 799-815

Abstract

A 1986 Memorandum of Understanding on softwood lumber imports (MOU) between Canada and the United States required that provinvial governments levy export taxes on softwood lumber shipped to the United States. This agreement, with subsequent amendments, influenced trade from 1987 until it was abandoned by Canada in October of 1991. This paper investigates the market impact of the MOU, firest by estimating an aggregate impact model of the Canadian share of the U.S. softwood lumber market and then by examinin the implied price, quantity, and welfare effects. While the study shows the anticipated gains to U.S. producers of softwood lumber and losses to Canadian producers, U.S. consumer and efficiency costs were high, and the net Canadian profit loss and export tax revenue was strongly positive. In addition, the net impact on market share appears to have persisted through 1990, inspite of considerable change in the policy's structure. These and other results should provide information for ongoing policy debate.

  • Citation: Wear, David N.; Lee, Karen J. 1993. U.S. Policy and Canadian Lumber: Effects of the 1986 Memorandum of Understanding. Forest Science, Vol. 39, No. 4, November 1993 pp. 799-815
  • Keywords: welfare economics, lumbar trade
  • Posted Date: April 1, 1980
  • Modified Date: August 25, 2014
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.