Effects of planting density and genotype on canopy size, canopy structure, and growth of 25-year-old loblolly pine stands in southeastern Oklahoma

This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document here.

  • Authors: Hennessey, Thomas C.; Will, Rodney E.; Lynch, Thomas B.; Heinemann, Robert; Holeman, Randal; Wilson, Dennis; Anderson, Keith; Campbell, Gregory
  • Publication Year: 2013
  • Publication Series: Poster
  • Source: In: Guldin, James M., ed. 2013. Proceedings of the 15th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-175. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 497-498.

Abstract

Leaf biomass and its display within the canopy are important driving variables of stand growth because they reflect a tree or stand’s capacity to intercept radiation, reduce carbon dioxide, and transpire water. We determined the effects of planting density (4- by 4-, 6- by 6-, 8- by 8-, and 10- by 10-foot spacing) on annual needle fall biomass, intercepted radiation, and canopy openness and then related these measures of canopy size to current annual increment and basal area for 25-year-old stands planted with two loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seed sources: North Carolina Coastal (NCC 8-01) and Oklahoma/Arkansas (O/A mix 4213). The study site is located on an excessively drained, mountain site in southeastern Oklahoma. Litter was measured using randomly located traps and summed for a phenological year (Apr. 1 to Mar. 31). Intercepted radiation and canopy openness were measured using hemispherical photographs and the WinScanopy canopy analysis software. After 25 years, initial planting density no longer significantly affected litterfall, intercepted radiation, or canopy openness. Canopy openness was greater for the North Carolina Coastal than the Oklahoma/Arkansas genotypes. Somewhat surprisingly, the measures of canopy size were not related to current annual increments. In contrast, basal area (or standing volume) was correlated to canopy size (R² = 0.12 for litterfall, R² = 0.45 for intercepted radiation, and R2 = 0.13 for canopy openness). Possible reasons for lack of a relationship between canopy size and current annual increment could be due to varying and sometimes intense intraspecific competition, environmental variation across the site, varying and sometimes large amounts of woody biomass relative to foliage, and previous stochastic events. Correlation between basal area and canopy size indicates canopy variables have some ability to predict basal area.

  • Citation: Hennessey, Thomas C.; Will, Rodney E.; Lynch, Thomas B.; Heinemann, Robert; Holeman, Randal; Wilson, Dennis; Anderson, Keith; Campbell, Gregory 2013. Effects of planting density and genotype on canopy size, canopy structure, and growth of 25-year-old loblolly pine stands in southeastern Oklahoma. In: Guldin, James M., ed. 2013. Proceedings of the 15th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-175. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 497-498.
  • Posted Date: August 14, 2013
  • Modified Date: August 14, 2013
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.