Hybridization Leads to Loss of Genetic Integrity in Shortleaf Pine: Unexpected Consequences of Pine Management and Fire Suppression

Download
(PDF; 562579)
Cite
Feedback
  • Authors: Tauer, Charles G.; Stewart, John F.; Will, Rodney E.; Lilly, Curtis J.; Guldin, James M.; Nelson, C. Dana
  • Publication Year: 2012
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Journal of Forestry 110(4):216-224
  • DOI: 10.5849/jof.11-044

Abstract

Hybridization between shortleaf pine and loblolly pine is causing loss of genetic integrity (the tendency of a population to maintain its genotypes over generations) in shortleaf pine, a species already exhibiting dramatic declines due to land-use changes. Recent findings indicate hybridization has increased in shortleaf pine stands from 3% during the 1950s to 45% for present-day natural regeneration. This drastic increase in hybridization is likely because of increased and wide-spread planting of loblolly pine and reduced selection pressure against loblolly pine and hybrids caused by fire suppression. Because shortleaf pine is more fire and drought tolerant than loblolly pine, loss of genetic integrity of shortleaf pine may reduce the resiliency and adaptability of southeastern conifer forests in the face of climate change and other stressors. Loblolly pine may also be at risk, with hybrids increasing in natural stands of loblolly pine from 4% in the 1950s to 27% at present.

  • Citation: Tauer, Charles G.; Stewart, John F.; Will, Rodney E.; Lilly, Curtis J.; Guldin, James M.; Nelson, C. Dana 2012. Hybridization leads to loss of genetic integrity in shortleaf pine: unexpected consequences of pine management and fire suppression. Journal of Forestry 110(4):216-224.
  • Keywords: shortleaf pine, loblolly pine, hybrids, introgression
  • Posted Date: June 28, 2012
  • Modified Date: April 26, 2013

    • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.