Unintended Consequences: Effect of the American Jobs Creation Act Reforestation Incentives on Family Forest Owners in the South

  • Authors: Greene, John L.; Straka, Thomas J.
  • Publication Year: 2008
  • Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)
  • Source: In: Proceedings of the 2007 Southern Forest Economics Workshop. 56–62.


Abstract: The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 rewrote the reforestation tax incentives available to private forest owners. Owners can now deduct outright reforestation costs up to $10,000 per year for each qualified timber property and amortize any additional amount over 8 tax years. To assess the economic effect of the new incentives on forest owners, the authors developed spreadsheets to calculate after-tax Bare Land Value (BLV) for representative management plans for family forests in the South under three tax situations: no reforestation incentives, the incentives under the previous law, and the incentives under the current law. We found that compared to no tax incentive, the current law chiefly benefits owners with high nontimber income, increasing BLV by roughly 20 percent, compared to 5–10 percent for owners with low or median income. Compared to the previous law, the current law chiefly benefits owners with large forest holdings, increasing BLV by roughly 5–15 percent, while decreasing BLV for owners with small holdings. These findings are significant since it appears Congress intended that the new incentives continue to benefit primarily “small woodland owners” with modest incomes and forest holdings.

  • Citation: Greene, John L.; Straka, Thomas J. 2008. Unintended consequences: Effect of the American Jobs Creation Act reforestation incentives on family forest owners in the South. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Southern Forest Economics Workshop. 56–62.
  • Keywords: Reforestation, tax, deduction, incentive, financial analysis
  • Posted Date: August 22, 2012
  • Modified Date: December 28, 2012
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.