Seed size- and density-related hidden treatments in common biodiversity experiments

  • Authors: Guo, Qinfeng
  • Publication Year: 2011
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Journal of Plant Ecology 4(3):132-137


With a few exceptions, most well-known field biodiversity experiments on ecosystem functioning have been conducted in plant communities (especially grasslands) in which different numbers of species are planted as treatments. In these experiments, investigators have either kept the total seed weight or seed number constant across treatment plots. However, although in some cases attempts have been made to randomly choose species for planting from a designated species pool, the issue of possible ‘hidden treatments’ remains unsolved. Particularly, the total and relative abundance among species and across treatments could still affect the results. This study aims to determine whether treatments related to planted seed abundance and seed size may contribute to observed productivity. Methods - We re-analyzed data from four biodiversity experiments based on a common seeding design (i.e. diversity treatments). Important Findings - We show that diversity (richness) treatments usually involve a hidden treatment related to the planted seeds (i.e. weight, number and seed size) that ultimately affect plant density. Thus, the un-intended hidden treatment of seeding more seeds on more diverse plots contributes to the productivity to some degree. Such derivative but often neglected hidden treatments are important for further improvement of experimental design and have significant implications in ecological restoration.

  • Citation: Guo, Qinfeng 2011. Seed size- and density-related hidden treatments in common biodiversity experiments. Journal of Plant Ecology 4(3):132-137.
  • Keywords: experimental design, productivity, restoration, seed number, seed weight
  • Posted Date: August 29, 2011
  • Modified Date: September 15, 2011
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.