Quantifying structural and physiological controls on variation in canopy transpiration among planted pine and hardwood species in the southern Appalachians

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that planted pine stands exhibit higher evapotranspiration (ET) and are more sensitive to climatic conditions compared with hardwood stands. Whether this is due to management and stand effects, biological effects or their interaction is poorly understood. We estimated growing season canopy- and sap flux-scaled leaf-level transpiration (Ec and EL) in five major overstory species over 3 years. Four hardwood species, Liriodendron tulipifera, Carya spp., Quercus rubra and Quercus prinus, were measured in an unmanaged watershed. Pinus strobus was measured in an adjacent planted pine watershed. We hypothesized that (1) species would differ in EL and stomatal conductance (GS), and their relationship with vapour pressure deficit (D); and (2) differences in growing season ET between the stands would result primarily from the differences in interception (Ei). Growing season ET in the planted pine stand exceeded hardwood ET by twofold during all 3 years. Transpiration and Ei contributed similarly to the ET difference, suggesting that physiological differences were equally as important as structural factors to the overall difference in ET. Among species, mean EL and GS differed significantly, as did their relationship with D. EL and GS of oaks and hickories were least responsive to changing D, while L. tulipifera and P. strobus were most responsive. This species-level understanding of variation in EL and GS and their interactions with climatic driving variables has important implications for predicting watershed-level responses to stand management, species invasion and loss, and climate variability.

  • Citation: Ford, Chelcy R.; Hubbard, Robert M.; Vose, James M. 2010. Quantifying structural and physiological controls on variation in canopy transpiration among planted pine and hardwood species in the southern Appalachians. Ecohydrology 3(2).
  • Keywords: Evapotranspiration, sap flow, species, stomatal conductance, transpiration
  • Posted Date: September 1, 2010
  • Modified Date: September 7, 2010
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.