Species diversity and composition in old growth and second growth rich coves of the southern Appalachian Mountains

  • Authors: Jackson, Clay; Pitillo, Dan; Allen, Lee; Wnetworth, Thomas R; Bullock, Bronson P; Loftis, David L.
  • Publication Year: 2009
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source:

Abstract

Because of ongoing debate over the long term impacts of logging, we conducted

a study to assess if second growth (70 6 10 years) rich coves differ from old growth rich coves

(. 125 years) in species diversity or composition. We sampled twenty-six 0.1 ha plots,

representing these two age classes. We distributed the plots amongst three randomly selected

mountain ranges in the southern Appalachians of North Carolina, and sampled each

mountain range in separate years. We used nested subplots of 0.01 m2, 0.1 m2, 1 m2, 10 m2,

100 m2, and 1000 m2 to establish species-area relationships (SARs) for each age class. We

found no significant differences between the SARs for the two age classes, nor did we find

significant differences between age classes using the Simpson, Shannon-Wiener, or Sorensen

indices of species diversity. However, we found that total cover of all plant species was greater

in old growth rich coves, and that 10% of the tested species had lower abundance in second

growth. No species were present in old growth and absent in second growth, but species with

lower second growth abundance may warrant future study.

  • Citation: Jackson, Clay B; Pitillo, Dan J; Allen Lee H; Wnetworth, Thomas R; Bullock, Bronson P; Loftis, David L. 2009. Species diversity and composition in old growth and second growth rich coves of the southern Appalachian Mountains. Castanea 74 (1): 27-38. March 2009
  • Keywords: old growth, Appalachian Mountains, logging, temporal constraints
  • Posted Date: November 12, 2009
  • Modified Date: November 13, 2009
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.