Integrating soil ecological knowledge into restoration management

  • Authors: Callaham, M.A.
  • Publication Year: 2008
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Restoration Ecology 16:608-617


The variability in the type of ecosystem degradation and
the specificity of restoration goals can challenge restorationists’
ability to generalize about approaches that lead
to restoration success. The discipline of soil ecology, which
emphasizes both soil organisms and ecosystem processes,
has generated a body of knowledge that can be generally
useful in improving the outcomes of restoration despite
this variability. Here, we propose that the usefulness of
this soil ecological knowledge (SEK) for restoration is
best considered in the context of the severity of the original
perturbation, the goals of the project, and the resilience
of the ecosystem to disturbance. A straightforward
manipulation of single physical, chemical, or biological
components of the soil system can be useful in the restoration
of a site, especially when the restoration goal is
loosely defined in terms of the species and processes that
management seeks to achieve. These single-factor manipulations
may in fact produce cascading effects on several
ecosystem attributes and can result in unintended recovery
trajectories. When complex outcomes are desired,
intentional and holistic integration of all aspects of the soil
knowledge is necessary. We provide a short roster of examples
to illustrate that SEK benefits management and
restoration of ecosystems and suggest areas for future

  • Citation: Heneghan, L., S.P. Miller, S. Baer, M.A. Callaham, Jr., J. Montgomery, M. Pavao-Zuckerman, C.C. Rhoades, S. Richardson, 2008. Integrating soil ecological knowledge into restoration management. Restoration Ecology 16:608-617.
  • Keywords: ecosystem processes, feedbacks, soil ecology.
  • Posted Date: October 20, 2009
  • Modified Date: November 2, 2009
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.