Mechanized or hand operations: which is less expensive for small timber?

  • Authors: Rummber, Robert; Klepac, John.
  • Publication Year: 2002
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Small Diameter Timber: Resource Management, Manufacturing, and Markets, Spokane, Washington.

Abstract

Two harvesting systems, one manual post-and-rail and one small-scale cut-to-length harvester, were compared in a lodgepole pine thinning. Elemental time study data were collected, along with estimates of residual stand damage. The harvester was about as productive as a manual crew of five. For material 5" and larger, the cost for felling, processing and piling small material with the harvester was less than the manual operation. However, the mechanized system resulted in considerably more residual stand damage.

  • Citation: Rummber, Robert; Klepac, John. 2002. Mechanized or hand operations: which is less expensive for small timber?. Small Diameter Timber: Resource Management, Manufacturing, and Markets, Spokane, Washington.
  • Keywords: costs, cut-to-length, harvester, lodgepole pine
  • Posted Date: August 11, 2009
  • Modified Date: August 11, 2009
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.