Hydrology and water budget for a forested atlantic coastal plain watershed, South Carolina

Abstract

Increases in timber demand and urban development in the Atlantic Coastal Plain over the past decade have motivated studies on the hydrology, water quality, and sustainable management of coastal plain watersheds. However, studies on baseline water budgets are limited for the low-lying, forested watersheds of the Atlantic Coastal Plain. The purpose of this study was to document the hydrology and a method to quantify the water budget of a first-order forested watershed, WS80, located within the USDA Forest Service Santee Experimental Forest northeast of Charleston, South Carolina. Annual Rainfall for the 2003 and 2004 periods were 1,671 mm (300 mm above normal) and 962 mm (over 400 mm below normal), respectively. Runoff coefficients(outflow as a fraction of total rainfall) for the 2003 and 2004 periods were 0.47 and 0.08, respectively,indicating a wide variability of outflows as affected by antecedent conditions. A spreadsheet-based Thornthwaite monthly water balance model was tested on WS80 using three different potential evapotranspiration estimators [Hamon, Thornthwaite, and Penman-Monteith (P-M)]. The Hamon and P-M-based methods performed reasonably well with average absolute monthly deviations of 12.6 and 13.9 rnm, respectively, between the measured and predicted outflows. Estimated closure errors were all within 9% for the 2003, 2004, and seasonal water budgets. These results may have implications on forest management practices and provide necessary baseline or reference information for Atlantic Coastal Plain watersheds.

  • Citation: Harder, Scott V.; Amatya, Devendra M,; Callahan Timothy J.; Trettin, Carl C.; Hakkila Jon 2007. Hydrology and water budget for a forested atlantic coastal plain watershed, South Carolina. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 43 (3): 1-13

Requesting Print Publications

Publication requests are subject to availability. Fiscal responsibility limits the hardcopies of publications we produce and distribute. Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, distributed and printed.

Please make any requests at pubrequest@fs.fed.us.

Publication Notes

  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
  • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.