Stem growth and respiration in loblolly pine plantations differing in soil resource availability

  • Authors: Maier, Chris A.
  • Publication Year: 2001
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Tree Physiology 21, 1183-1193. Heron Publishing-Victoria, Canada


Stem respiration and growth in 10-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations were measured monthly during the third year of fertilization and irrigation treatments to determine whether soil resource availability differentially altered growth and respiration in stem tissue. Fertilized trees had significantly greater stem biomass, stem nitrogen concentration ([N]) and growth rate than unfertilized trees. Stem respiration (Rt) was significantly greater in fertilized trees when ex-pressed on a per unit surface area (Rt,a, µmol CO2 m-2 s-1 ), sap-wood volume (Rt,v, µmol CO2 m-3 s-1 ), or mass (Rt,w, nmol CO2 g -1 s -1 ) basis; however, there was no difference between treatments when expressed as a function of stem N content (Rt,n, µmol CO2 (mol N)-1 s-1 ). Irrigation had no significant effect on Rt or annual stem growth. Daily total respiration (Rd, mol CO2 m-2 day-1 ) and stem diameter growth both had a seasonal bi-modal pattern with peaks in early spring and midsummer. Stem [N] declined significantly during the growing season. Stem growth rate and [N] explaned 75% of the seasonal variation in temperature-normalized Rt,a.

  • Citation: Maier, Chris A. 2001. Stem growth and respiration in loblolly pine plantations differing in soil resource availability. Tree Physiology 21, 1183-1193. Heron Publishing-Victoria, Canada
  • Posted Date: April 1, 1980
  • Modified Date: August 22, 2006
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.