Harvesting impacts as a function of removal intensity

  • Authors: Stokes, Bryce J.; Kluender, R.A.; Klepac, J.F.; Lortz, D.A.
  • Publication Year: 1997
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Proceedings of a symposium organized by IUFRO Project Group P3.11.00 at the IUFRO World Congress

Abstract

Single-tree selection, group selection, shelterwood, seed-tree, and clearcut harvesting methods were evaluated for residual site impacts. The stands were harvested during the summer of 1993 on the Ouachita National Forest in Arkansas. Manual felling and rubber-tired skidders were used to harvest all 23 stands. Percentage of area in primary skid trails was 8.2, 9.6, 13.2, 12.5, and 13.7 for the single-tree selection, group selection, shelterwood, seed-tree, and clearcut treatments, respectively. The single-tree selection treatment had the most undisturbed soil area (39.4 percent) after harvesting, as compared to 25.6 percent for the group selection, 13.1 for the shelterwood, 9.1 for the seed-tree, and 6.0 for the clearcut. Residual pine damage was greatest for the group selection treatment.

  • Citation: Stokes, Bryce J.; Kluender, R.A.; Klepac, J.F.; Lortz, D.A. 1997. Harvesting impacts as a function of removal intensity. Proceedings of a symposium organized by IUFRO Project Group P3.11.00 at the IUFRO World Congress
  • Posted Date: April 1, 1980
  • Modified Date: August 22, 2006
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.