Agency perspectives on transition to participatory forest management: a case study from Tamil Nadu, India

  • Authors: Matta, Jagannadha; Alavalapati, Janaki; Kerr, John; Mercer, Evan
  • Publication Year: 2005
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Society and Natural Resources, 18:859-870

Abstract

India’s Joint Forest Management (JFM) policy, in which government forest agencies and local communities jointly manage forests, has been touted as a successful strategy in helping both forests and people. Its efficacy in the field, however, is uneven. Although government forest departments are charged with implementing JFM, very little is known about their perspectives on this policy. Assessment of foresters’ perspectives on JFM in Tamil Nadu, India, revealed that despite foresters’ motivation toward implementing this policy, uncertain incentives and institutional complexities make the task complex and difficult. While decentralized decision making in the Tamil Nadu Forest Department could help mitigate the situation, the department’s culture that limits feedback in the system stands as a strong barrier against organizational adaptation. Hence, pragmatic strategies for promoting participatory forest management should focus first on improving the institutional conditions of foresters’ work in order to develop a shared vision and a unified strategy for successful action.

  • Citation: Matta, Jagannadha; Alavalapati, Janaki; Kerr, John; Mercer, Evan 2005. Agency perspectives on transition to participatory forest management: a case study from Tamil Nadu, India. Society and Natural Resources, 18:859-870
  • Keywords: employee perspectives, joint forest management, organizational change, public participation
  • Posted Date: April 1, 1980
  • Modified Date: August 22, 2006
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.