A Practical Decision-Analysis Process for Forest Ecosystem Management

  • Authors: Rauscher, H. Michael; Lloyd, F. Thomas; Loftis, David L.; Twery, Mark J.
  • Publication Year: 2000
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27 (2000) 195-226

Abstract

Many authors have pointed out the need to firm up the 'fuzzy' ecosystem management paradigm and develop operationally practical processes to allow forest managers to accommodate more effectively the continuing rapid change in societal perspectives and goals. There are three spatial scales where clear, precise, practical ecosystem management processes are needed: the regional assessment scale, the forest-level scale, and the project-level scale. This paper proposes a practical decision analysis process for ecosystem management at the project-level scale. Goals are the focal point of management. To achieve them requires a formal, structured goal hierarchy, desired future conditions, several interesting alternatives, scenario analysis, and monitoring and evaluation of the results. The proposed process is firmly grounded in the body of theory and practice organized in the scientific literature under the heading of multi-objective decision analysis. An illustrative example of this decision analysis process is presented using the Bent Creek Experimental Forest of the Pisgah National Forest near Asheville, NC as a test case.

  • Citation: Rauscher, H. Michael; Lloyd, F. Thomas; Loftis, David L.; Twery, Mark J. 2000. A Practical Decision-Analysis Process for Forest Ecosystem Management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27 (2000) 195-226
  • Keywords: decision analysis, forest planning, adaptive management, ecosystem management, national forests, analytical hierarchy process (AHP)
  • Posted Date: April 1, 1980
  • Modified Date: August 22, 2006
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.