Management of Forested Landscapes: Simulations of three alternatives

  • Authors: Boyce, Stephen G.; McNab, W. Henry
  • Publication Year: 1994
  • Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
  • Source: JournalofForestry,Vol. 92, No. 1, January 1994.


Forested landscapes can be managed to support variouscombinations of timber, biological diversity,esthetic values, and habitats. However, all such management decisions arechoices basedon opinions about future events. Opinions underlie managementdecisionsbecause thereis no way to jump into the future, verify a future event, jump back to the present, and make a decision.

Research conclusions and experiences help us build mental models with which to make management decisions.However,conclusions and experiences become opinions when they are included in decisions about future events. Simulation models help managers display mental models for scrutiny, exchange ideas with others, and compare the consequences of imposing different opinions on a forested landscape. Thus they aid, but do not replace, mental models.

What aresome of the consequences expected from imposing different opinionson thesame forested landscape? This article compares simulatedconsequences of three different opinions as if each were imposed on the same forested landscapein the southern Appalachian Mountains. One set of opinions would stopal1 harvest of timber; a second set would impose traditional forestry practices; and a third set would impose landscape forestry. Outcomes from these simulations indicate that landscapesorganized for old-growth, biologicaldiversity, habitats, and esthetic values limit timber harvests and cashflows.

  • Citation: Boyce, Stephen G.; McNab, W. Henry 1994. Management of Forested Landscapes: Simulations of three alternatives. JournalofForestry,Vol. 92, No. 1, January 1994.
  • Posted Date: April 1, 1980
  • Modified Date: August 22, 2006
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.