Search this site:

Literature Cited

Abt, R.C.; Cubbage, F.W.; Pacheco, G. 2000. Southern forest resource assessment using the subregional timber supply (SRTS) model. Forest Products Journal. 50(4): 25–33.

Adams, D.; Haynes, R. 1996. The 1993 timber assessment market model: structure, projections, and policy simulations. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW–GTR–368. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 58 p.

Bailey, R.G. 1995. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. Misc. Publ. 1391. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 108 p.

Barbier, E.B. 1996. Impact of the Uruguay round on international trade in forest products. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Number of pages unknown].

Bonnefoi, B.; Buongiorno, J. 1990. Comparative advantage of countries in forest-products trade. Forest Ecology and Management. 36: 1–17.

Castillo, S.; Laarman, J.G. 1984. A market-share model to assess price competitiveness of softwood lumber exports to Caribbean markets. Forest Science. 30: 928–932.

Dodrill, J.D.; Cubbage, F.W. 2000. Potential wood chip mill harvest area impacts in North Carolina. Report prepared for the study on: economic and ecologic impacts associated with wood chip production in North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: Southern Center for Sustainable Forests, North Carolina State University, Duke University, and the North Carolina Division of Forest Resources. 25 p. On file with: Southern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, P.O. Box 12254, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

Guan, H.; Munn, I.A. 2000. Harvest restrictions: an analysis of new capital expenditures in the Pacific Northwest and the South. Journal of Forestry. 98(4): 11–17.

Hair, D. 1963. The economic importance of timber in the United States. Misc. Publ. 941. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 91 p.

Hardie, I.; Parks, P.; Gottleib, P.; Wear, D.N. 2000. Responsiveness of rural and urban land uses to land rent determinants in the U.S. South. Land Economics. 76(4): 659–673.

Haynes, R.; Adams, D.; Alig, R. [and others]. 2002. The 2000 RPA timber assessment: an analysis of the timber situation in the United States, 1952 to 2050. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. [RPA timber assessment homepage]. http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/sev/rpa/. [Date accessed: May 3, 2002].

Hyldahl, C.A.; Hansen, B.G.; West, C.D. 2000. Hardwood chips: production, consumption, and exports. In: Society of American Foresters National Convention. Washington, DC: [Society of American Foresters]. [Poster]. [Number of page unknown].

Ince, P. 2000. Industrial wood productivity in the United States, 1900–1998. Res. Note FPL–RN–0272. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 14 p.

Johnson, T.G. 1996. Trends in southern pulpwood production, 1953–1993. Resour. Bull. SRS–3. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 24 p.

Johnson, T.G.; Howell, M. 1996. Southern pulpwood production, 1994. Resour. Bull. SRS–1. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 40 p.

Johnson, T.G.; Steppleton, C.D. 1996. Southern pulpwood production, 1995. Resour. Bull. SRS–8. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 40 p.

Johnson, T.G.; Steppleton, C.D. 1997. Southern pulpwood production, 1996. Resour. Bull. SRS–21. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 40 p.

Johnson, T.G.; Steppleton, C.D. 1999. Southern pulpwood production, 1997. Resour. Bull. SRS–37. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 40 p.

Johnson, T.G.; Steppleton, C.D. 2000. Southern pulpwood production, 1998. Resour. Bull. SRS–50. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 40 p.

Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry. 2000. Quarterly report of forest products data: 1955 to current report. Baton Rouge, LA: Office of Marketing. [Date accessed: August 13, 2002]. http://www.ldaf.state.la.us/divisions/forestry/reports/quarterreport/original-report.asp.

Murray, B.C.; Lee, K.J. 1990. An econometric model of private land management in Georgia. In: Hickman, C.A., ed. Proceedings of the southern forest economics workshop on evaluating even- and all-aged timber management options for southern forest lands. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-79. New Orleans: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station: 81–87.

Murray, B.C.; Wear, D.N. 1998. Federal timber restrictions and interregional arbitrage in U.S. lumber. Land Economics. 74(1): 76–91.

Phelps, R.B. 1980. Timber in the United States economy, 1963, 1967, and 1972. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO–21. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 90 p.

Powell, D.S.; Faulkner, J.L.; Darr, D.R. [and others]. 1994. Forest resources of the United States, 1992. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM–234. Revised. Ft. Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 133 p.

Prestemon, J.P.; Buongiorno, J. 1996. The impacts of NAFTA on U.S. and Canadian forest product exports to Mexico. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 26(5): 794–809.

Prestemon, J.P.; Butry, D.T.; Pye, J.M.; Stratton, D.T. 2001a. Locations of southern wood chip mills for 2000. [Database]. http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/econ/data/mills/chip2000.htm. [Date accessed: July 3, 2002, URL corrected July 15, 2003].

Prestemon, J.P.; Pye, J.M. 1999. Mill locations. [Database]. http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/econ/data/mills/mills.htm. [Date accessed: July 3, 2002, URL updated July 15, 2003].

Prestemon, J.P.; Pye, J.M.; Butry, D.T.; Stratton, D.T. 2001b. Locations of southern wood chip mills for 2000. [Database]. http://www.srs.fs.fed.us/econ/data/mills/chip2000.htm. [Date accessed: July 3, 2002, URL corrected 7/15/2003].

Trømborg, E.; Buongiorno, J.; Solberg, B. 2000. The global timber market: implications of changes in economic growth, timber supply, and technological trends. Forest Policy and Economics. 1(1): 53–69.

United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization. 2000a. Direction of trade, 1997. [Database]. http://apps.fao.org/page/collections?subset=forestry. [Date accessed: July 3, 2002].

United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization. 2000b. FAOSTAT forestry data. http://apps.fao.org/page/collections?subset=forestry. [Date accessed: July 3, 2002].

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1958. Timber resources for America's future. For. Resour. Rep. 14. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 713 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1982. An analysis of the timber situation in the United States 1952–2030. For. Resour. Rep. 23. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 499 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 2000. Timber harvested on the national forests under sales and land exchanges by regions and fiscal years. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. [Number of pages unknown].

Waddell, K.L.; Oswald, D.D.; Powell, D.S. 1989. Forest statistics of the United States, 1987. Bull. PNW–RB–168. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 106 p.