skip banner Southern Forest Resource Assessment    Draft Report


Search this site:

 

Home > Draft Report > AQUA-4   

Previous Page

Table 1-Best management practice implementation monitoring program characteristics of 13 Southern States

STATE


Number of BMP implemen-tation surveys


Latest reported overall statewide implementation rate


Latest survey report


Formal interagency State agreements


Ownership classes reporteda


Identified BMP implementation needs


Comments


ALABAMA


6


93%


n/a


yes


n/a


n/a


BMP implementation is determined by aerial survey. BMP implementation surveys are conducted, but there are no published reports as such.


ARKANSAS


2


80%


1999


yes


F, FI, S, NIPF


Roads and harvesting


Southern BMP monitoring recommendations incorporated.


FLORIDA


10


96%


1999


no


P, FI, NIPF


Roads & trails, and stream crossings


Risk to water quality is evaluated. Southern BMP monitoring recommendations incorporated.


GEORGIA


3


79% of BMPs, 98% of assessed acres


1998


yes


FI, P, NIPF


Stream crossings


Risk to water quality is evaluated. Southern BMP monitoring recommendations incorporated


KENTUCKY


1


35% were effective


n/a


no


P, FI, NIPF


n/a


BMPs made mandatory in July 2001. A BMP implementation survey was conducted, but there is no published survey report as such.


LOUISIANA


4


83% qualitative,
93% quantitative


1997


no


FI, CNIF, P, NIPF


SMZs and permanent roads


As professional assistance increased, BMP implementation increased


MISSISSIPPI


1


87%


n/a


no


n/a


n/a


A BMP implementation survey was conducted, but there is no published survey report as such. New BMP monitoring strategy being developed.


NORTH CAROLINA


2


95%


1996


yes


P, FI, NIPF


Permanent roads, water bars on temporary roads and skid trails, and SMZ encroachment


As professional assistance increased, BMP implementation increased. Southern BMP monitoring recommendations incorporated.


OKLAHOMA


0


n/a


n/a


no


n/a


n/a


BMP monitoring program being developed


SOUTH CAROLINA


5


91.5% Harvesting BMPs, 98% site prep BMPs


1997


yes


P, FI, NIPF


Harvesting systems, SMZs and stream crossings


Risk to water quality is evaluated. Courtesy exam believed effective


TENNESSEE


2


63%


1996


yes


n/a


Stream crossings, SMZ encroachment, revegetation of disturbed areas, logging debris in streams


Risk to water quality is evaluated. Southern BMP monitoring recommendations incorporated.


TEXAS


4


89%


1999


no


F, FI, NIPF


Stream crossings, temporary roads and skid trails


Risk to water quality is evaluated. BMP implementation increased with professional assistance, logger and landowner training, and BMP inclusion in the logging contracts. Southern BMP monitoring recommendations incorporated.


VIRGINIA


10


90% partial implementation, 7% full implementation


1999


no


n/a


Water control structures and vegetative cover of disturbed mineral soil


Risk to water quality is evaluated


aOwnership code


Definition


F


Federal


FI


Forest Industry


S


State


P


Private


CNIF


Corporate non-Industrial


NIPF


Nonindustrial private forest owners


Return to first reference in text


Previous Page

Glossary | Sci.Names | Process | Comments | Final Report

 

content: Bruce Prud’homme
webmaster: John M. Pye

created: 21-NOV-2001