Rex Schaberg (Presenter), Duke University
(presently NCSU)
P.B. Aruna
Frederick W. Cubbage, North Carolina State University
Dan Richter, Duke University
George Hess, North Carolina State University
Robert C. Abt, North Carolina State University
James Gregory
Sarah Warren
Anthony Snider
Brandon Greco
Stacy Sherling
John Dodrill
The North Carolina Wood Chip Mill Study examined the economic and ecological
impacts associated with production of wood chips at 18 satellite chip
mills and with timber harvesting in the state of North Carolina. The
integrated study used interdependent data and models to analyze and
project forest resource conditions and land area change, timber product
outputs, timber supply projections, soil erosion rates, and wildlife
habitat. Additional related analyses examined timber market structure,
forest inventory impacts around new mills, stormwater runoff practices
at chip mills, opinions of community members near mills, and economic
benefits generated by wood chip markets for private forest landowners.
The study found that North Carolina's forest land area increased from
1938 to 1964, and has decreased since then. Forests covered 19.3 million
acres in the state in 1990, or about 62% of the total land area. Total
softwood and hardwood timber volumes in North Carolina increased from
14.7 billion to 32.7 billion cubic feet from 1938 to 1990, or a 122%
increase. Softwood volumes increased from 7.4 to 12.5 billion cubic
feet (69%). Hardwood volumes increased from 7.3 to 20.2 billion cubic
feet (175%).
Large forest land losses occurred in North Carolina from 1982 to 1997,
averaging about 77,000 acres per year, or -0.35 annually. Urban land
area increased more than a million acres from 1982 to 1997, or 111,000
acres per year. In comparison, by 2000, timber harvests were estimated
to affect about 500,000 acres per year, with 350,000 of those acres
being clearcut and about 50,000 of those clearcut acres being needed
to furnish wood chip mills. About 350,000 forested acres per year were
affected by natural disasters such as hurricanes, fires, and insects
and disease during the 1980s.
Between 1990 and 1997, pine pulpwood production volumes increased 24%;
hardwood pulpwood production increased 17%; and combined pulpwood production
increased 21%. In 1997, wood chip mills processed about 27% of the state's
pulpwood harvest, and 12% of the state's total timber harvest. About
15% of the pulpwood in the Coastal Plain was processed by wood chip
mills; 49% in the Piedmont; and 75% in the Mountains. In 1997, 25% of
North Carolina pulpwood production was exported to other states, and
6% was exported out of the country.
Wood chip mills were statistically correlated with an increase in timber
production and harvest in the state, especially in the Piedmont and
Mountains. Wood chip mills would require the equivalent of about 1000
acres per 100,000 tons of capacity per year to provide the wood for
each mill. They were generally located in areas where wood supply was
plentiful, and usually would not individually make harvest levels exceed
growth levels in the areas within 50 miles of the mills, but the cumulative
effects of overlapping mill procurement zones and other harvests would
need additional analyses.
Timber supply projections were made for private forest lands. They
assumed that timber harvest rates would increase about 1% per year,
and forest land losses would occur at the -0.35% per year, distributed
per historical trends among the five major forest management types in
the state. The projections indicated that softwood removals on private
forest lands exceeded growth as of 1990, and would continue to do so,
decreasing total softwood inventory to 10.3 billion cubic feet by 2020,
from the 1990 level of 11.2 billion cubic feet. Hardwood removals would
exceed growth by about 2005, decreasing projected inventory slightly
from 17.5 billion cubic feet in 1990 to 17.3 billion cubic feet in 2020.
Thus total projected timber removals exceeded growth by 178 million
cubic feet per year by 2020. Timber inventory trends were very sensitive
to small changes in both timber harvests or in forest land area.
The planted pine area was projected to increase about 1.1 million acres
between 1990 and 2020, and natural pine management types were projected
to decrease by about 1.1 million acres. All other natural forest management
types were projected to decline from about 225,000 acres (lowland hardwoods)
to 500,000 acres (upland hardwoods and mixed-pine hardwoods) from 1990
to 2010. These timber harvest increases would alter forest structures
on private forest lands, generally creating more young seral stages
after harvests, and fewer old growth seral stages. The Coastal Plain
and Piedmont had the most adverse effects of projected changes on forest
habitat for bird, amphibian, and reptile species identified as being
of conservation concern in the state. Most species of conservation concern
would experience increases in their forest habitat in the Mountains,
with only a few species being adversely affected. If management of public
lands favors mature forests, their addition would not change the projections
much in the Coastal Plain; reverse much of the generally adverse wildlife
habitat impacts in the Piedmont; and improve conditions even more for
species in the Mountains.
For the state of North Carolina in aggregate, agricultural lands were
computed to contribute about 54% of the total erosion load in the state
as of 1997; urban land was estimated to contribute about 25%; minor
land uses about 8.5%; forest land uses about 6.7%; and rural transportation
about 2.9%. The approximate area of newly disturbed urban land and rural
roads contributed about 14.2% per year. Undisturbed natural forests
contributed about 4.5% to the state's erosion as of 1997. All timber
harvest practices probably contributed about 1% more of the state's
erosion load, with wood chip harvests probably about 0.1%, and mechanical
site preparation perhaps another 1.2%. State forestry surveys indicate
that BMPs have been widely used, with more than 90% of timber harvests
inspected being found in compliance.
Visual surveys of 12 wood chip mills found that they have effective
stormwater management plans, with little indication of adverse effects
on water quality from mill discharges. Accelerated channel erosion was
the most common stormwater problem at wood chip mills, and could be
reduced by using BMPs (detention ponds, water bars, filter, terracing,
etc.). Stream water quality sampling was not performed.
As of 1996, forest products firms employed 105,000 people and the nature-based
tourism industry employed about 91,000 people. Total employee compensation
in the wood-based industries was $3.2 billion; for tourism it was $1.4
billion. Thus the average wood based industry annual wage was $30,800.
The average tourism sector annual wage was $15,500. Industrial output
was $13.5 billion for the forest products industry in 1996, and $3.9
billion for the tourism sector. Total sales value for all travel and
tourism in 1984 was $8.3 billion. Value added for the forest products
industry was $4.9 billion and was $2.2 billion for the nature-based
tourism sector. From 1977 to 1996, the wood-based industries grew more
slowly than the rest of the state's economy; the nature-based tourism
sector grew more rapidly. Regional economic multipliers for the wood-based
sector were slightly larger than those for the nature-based tourism
sector. Nonmarket values estimates could equal or exceed the estimates
of direct market values from forest products or from tourism.
Wood chip mills did contribute to greater integration among timber
markets in the state, and led to up to $5 million or more in added returns
received by nonindustrial private forest landowners. Social impact analysis
found that polarization is increasing particularly because of the growing
perception that private properties provide public benefits, resulting
in conflict and confusion related to private property rights and responsibilities.
Differences of opinion and perception are exacerbated by economic and
social stress in North Carolina's rural communities.
Workshop III: Forest Uses