John M. Pye (Presenter), Southern Research
Station, USDA Forest Service
Harbin Li, The Center for Forested Wetlands Research
William D. Smith, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service
To protect water quality and enhance other benefits of forests, the
Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) and the various State Best Management
Practices (BMPs) specify streamside management zones (SMZs) within which
harvesting activities are limited. While it is not yet clear how stringent
these riparian protections must be to reach water quality objectives,
the debate over optimal practices is enhanced by a better understanding
of all the tradeoffs involved, including the economic consequences for
landowners of alternative riparian restrictions. This study investigates
the impacts on timber revenues of two key SMZ variables: the width of
riparian buffers and the degree of harvesting restrictions within them.
We used a stratified random process to combine FIA data with three selected
land cover maps from the Atlantic Coastal Plain, creating simulated
landscapes with both spatial realism and detailed information on forest
composition. The forest landscape model LEEMATH is then used to simulate
timber revenues under combinations of three SMZ widths (33, 100, 300
ft) and three levels of harvest restrictions (no harvest, two levels
of thinning) within the zones. A simulation without SMZ and harvest
restrictions is also run as the control. The differences in net timber
revenues between these scenarios provide a measure of the marginal cost
to landowners of alternative policy specifications. Any comprehensive
evaluation of riparian policy tradeoffs must also consider their effects
on water quality, wildlife habitat, aesthetic value, and hunting revenue
opportunities. Spatial simulation tools such as LEEMATH will be necessary
to evaluate each of these factors as well.
Workshop VII: Aquatic
Ecosystems
Online presentation