Stephen P. Prisley (Presenter), Department of Forestry,
Virginia Tech
Andrew J. Malmquist, Forest Technology Group
When forest managers and policymakers wish to assess the ability of
a given forest resource to support a sustainable level of timber harvests,
they frequently use growth/removals ratios (G/R) developed from forest
inventory data. Recently published inventory data for forests of the
southern U.S. have documented numerous states in which softwood harvests
exceed softwood growth, raising concern over the sustainability of this
critical resource.
At the same time, forest managers in the south have been investing
in a wide range of practices that have dramatically increased the growth
rates in softwood plantations. As these growth increases are verified
in the field, forest managers respond accordingly with adjustments to
management regimes, including shortening of rotation lengths. This,
in turn, means that the area of forest harvested annually must increase
in a given forest estate to approach an area-regulated forest condition.
A spreadsheet model has been developed which evaluates the impacts
of shortening rotation lengths on the growth/removals ratios for managed
forests. The model demonstrates that a temporary imbalance of removals
over growth results when the rotation age is shortened. Hence, managers
and policymakers should use caution when making inferences or public
claims about sustainable harvest levels from growth/removals ratios
alone: if the public has been convinced that G/R ratios greater than
one imply sustainable harvests, then difficult explanations will be
required when G/R drops below one.
Workshop VI: Monitoring
Forest Management