Publication Information
| Title:
| Biophysical controls on soil respiration in the dominant patch types of an old-growth, mixed-conifer forest |
| Author(s): |
Ma, Siyan; Chen, Jiquan; Butnor, John R.; North, Malcolm; Euskirchen, Eugénie S.; Oakley, Brian |
| Date: |
2005 |
| Source: |
Forest Science 51(3):221-232 |
| Description: |
Little is known about biophysical controls on soil respiration in California's Sierra Nevada old-growth, mixed-conifer forests. Using portable and automated soil respiration sampling units, we measured soil respiration rate (SRR) in three dominant patch types: closed canopy (CC), ceanothus-dominated patches (CECO), and open canopy (OC). SRR varied significantly among the patch types, ranging from 2.0 to 4.5 μmol m-2 s-1 and from 0.9 to 2.9 μmol m-2 s-1 during the 1999 and 2000 measuring periods, respectively, with the maximum in CECO and the minimum in OC. Multiple peaks of seasonal SRR were functions of soil temperature and moisture dynamics. The relationship between SRR and soil temperature switched from a positive to a negative correlation when soil moisture dropped from saturation to drought. Time lag, as a function of soil moisture, was included in an exponential model to assess the effects of soil moisture on SRR in this seasonal water-stressed ecosystem. The total soil C flux summed by an area-weighted average across all three patch types was 660 ± 163 g C m-2 from May to Oct. 2000. These results may be applicable to other water-stressed forests in the Mediterranean climate Lone, and have implications for the conservation of soil carbon. |
 |
View and Print this Publication (918 KB) |
| Pristine Version: |
An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here: View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (1.4 MB) |
Publication Notes: |
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some
typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable.
|
![[ Get Acrobat ]](/images/getacro.gif) |
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility |