How Do You Rate This Publication?       

Title:	Nonequilibrium regolith thickness in the Ouachita Mountains
Author(s):	Phillips, Jonathan D.; Marion, Daniel A.; Luckow, Kenneth; Adams, Kristin R.
Date:	2005
Source:	The Journal of Geology, Vol. 113, pp. 325-340 (2005)
Description:	Interpretations of regolith and soil thickness in the context of landscape evolution are typically based on the notion that thickness is controlled by the interaction of weathering rates and erosion and tuned to topography. On slideslopes of the Quachita Mountains, Arkansas, however, there is a high degree of local spatial varibilty that is largely unrelated to topography. This indicates nonequilibrium in the sense that there is no evidence of balance between rates of weathering and removal, as is postulated in some conceptual models geomorphology and pedology. Johnson's soil thickness model is applied as an alternative to interpret local variations in regolith thickness. At the study sites, regolith thickness is not generally related to slope, curvature, elevation, or pedogenic development in the in the solum. This indicates that varibility in thickness is related chiefly to processes and controls acting in the lower regolith, below the solum. The primary controls of varibility are local lithological variation, variable structural resistance associated with fractures and bedding planes in strongly tilted Paleozoic sedimentary parent material, and point-centered pedological influences of trees. A steady state regolith may be relatively rare. Results of this study suggest that an equilibrim regolith thickness is most likely in uniform lithology with a high degree of lithologic purity, less likely in interbedded sedimentary rocks, and more unlikely still if the latter are tilted and fractured. Equilibrium thickness would also be more likely where the effects of bioturbation are more areally uniform (as opposed to the point-centered effects of individual trees) and where the biomantle is above the weathering front.
	View and Print this Publication (1.4 MB)
Pristine Version:	An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here: View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (2.1 MB)
Publication Notes:	We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information. This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable.
	Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility