Browse Units


Contact Information

Southern
Research Station

200 W.T. Weaver Blvd.
Asheville, NC
28804-3454
(828) 257-4832
(828) 259-0503 TTY

Publication Information

 Evaluate this publication
How Do You Rate This Publication?
  Bookmark and Share       Mail this page

Title: Alternative skid trail retirement options for steep terrain logging
Author(s): Smidt, Mathew F.; Kolka, Randall K.
Date: 2001
Source: Proceedings of the 24th Annual COI3 Meeting: 13-17.
Description: In winter 1999-2000 trials of deep tillage and recontouring of skid trails were implemented on three sites in northeastern Kentucky, USA to examine their potential as skid trail retirement options. While effective, current Best Management Practices (BMPs) for trail retirement do not address two potential benefits of retirement: recovery of normal hill slope hydrology and amelioration of soil compaction. Subsoiling and recontouring both significantly reduced soil compaction compared to the control. Preliminary data from runoff sampling indicated none of the treatments were similar to the undisturbed hillside, but recontoured treatments had surface runoff 77% of the control and sediment yield 41% of the control. Subsoil treatments results for sediment yield and runoff volume were between the control and recontour treatments. Production levels from research application of deep tillage showed that the cost could be competitive with conventional BMPs. The recontouring treatment was three to five times the cost of conventional BMPs. General application of deep tillage and site-specific application of recontouring may be cost neutral or reduce net cost of BMPs if treatments increase tree growth or significantly improve water quality.
View and Print this Publication (389 KB)     Evaluate this publication
Pristine Version: An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here:

View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (611 KB)

Publication Notes: We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable.
 [ Get Acrobat ] Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility