
How Do You Rate This Publication?
![]()
| Title: | Effects of habitat isolation on the recovery of fish assemblages in experimentally defaunated stream pools in Arkansas |
|---|---|
| Author(s): | Lonzarich, David George; Warren, Melvin L., Jr.; Lonzrich, Mary Ruth Elger |
| Date: | 1998 |
| Source: | Canadian. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 55: 2141-2149. |
| Description: | The authors removed fish from pools in two Arkansas streams to determine recolonization rates and the effects of isolation (i.e., riffle length, riffle depth, distance to large source pools, and location), pool area, and assemblage size on recovery. To determine pool-specific recovery rates, the authors repeatedly snorkeled 12 pools over a 40-day recovery period. Results indicated the effects of isolation on percent numerical recovery, but no effects of pool area or assemblage size. Numerical recovery of assemblages in pools separated from neighboring pools by short riffles occurred by day 30, whereas more isolated pools had not reached 70 percent numerical recovery by day 40. Recovery also was more rapid in downstream pools and in pools that were closer to large source pools. Finally, recovery patterns differed among species and size-classes, with large fish (<100 mm total length) recolonizing pools more rapidly than small fish. This is the first study to quantify species- and assemblage-level recolonization rates at the scale of individual pools and the effects of isolation on recovery. The findings of this study have potentially important implications for research aimed at understanding the ecology of stream fishes and predicting the consequences of land-use activities. |
View and Print this Publication (232 KB) ![]() |
|
| Pristine Version: | An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here: View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (1.3 MB) | Publication Notes: |
We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable. |
| Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility |