Publication Information
| Title:
| Topographic and ecological controls on root reinforcement |
| Author(s): |
Hales, T.C.; Ford, C.R.; Hwang, T.; Vose, J.M.; Band, L.E. |
| Date: |
2009 |
| Source: |
J. Geophys. Res., 114 |
| Description: |
Shallow landslides are a significant hazard in steep, soil-mantled landscapes. During
intense rainfall events, the distribution of shallow landslides is controlled by variations
in landscape gradient, the frictional and cohesive properties of soil and roots, and the
subsurface hydrologic response. While gradients can be estimated from digital elevation
models, information on soil and root properties remains sparse. We investigated whether
geomorphically controlled variations in ecology affect the spatial distribution of root
cohesion by measuring the distribution and tensile strength of roots from soil pits dug
downslope of 15 native trees in the southern Appalachian Mountains, North Carolina,
United States. Root tensile strengths from different hardwood tree species were similar
and consistently higher than the only native shrub species measured (Rhododendron
maximum). Roots were stronger in trees found on noses (areas of divergent topography)
relative to those in hollows (unchanneled, convergent topography) coincident with the
variability in cellulose content. This cellulose variability is likely related to topographic
differences in soil water potential. For all species, roots were concentrated close to the
soil surface, with roots in hollows being more evenly distributed in the soil column than
those on noses. Trees located on noses had higher mean root cohesion than those in
hollows because of a higher root tensile force. R. maximum had the shallowest, weakest
roots suggesting that recent expansion of this species due to fire suppression has likely
lowered the root cohesion of some hollows. Quantification of this feedback between
physiologic controls on root growth and slope hydrology has allowed us to create
a curvature-based model of root cohesion that is a significant improvement on current
models that assume a spatially averaged value. |
 |
View and Print this Publication (1.34 MB) |
Publication Notes: |
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some
typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable.
|
![[ Get Acrobat ]](/images/getacro.gif) |
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility |