| Title: |
An alternative to traditional goodness-of-fit tests for discretely measured continuous data |
| Author(s): |
Randolph, KaDonna C.; Seaver, Bill |
| Date: |
2007 |
| Source: |
Forest Science, Vol. 53(5): 590-599 |
| Description: |
Traditional goodness-of-fit tests such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and x2 tests are easily applied to data of the continuous or discrete type, respectively. Occasionally, however, the case arises when continuous data are recorded into discrete categories due to an imprecise measurement system. In this instance, the traditional goodness-of-fit tests may not be wholly applicable because of an unmanageable number of ties in the data, sparse contingency tables, or both; therefore, a flexible alternative to goodness-of-fit tests for discretely measured continuous data is presented. The proposed methodology bootstraps confidence intervals for the difference between selected percentiles of the empirical distribution functions of two samples. Application of the approach is illustrated with a comparison of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) tree crown density distributions at the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles simultaneously. |
| Key Words: |
bootstrapping, crown density, empirical distribution function, percentiles |
![[ PDF Icon ] [ PDF Icon ]](../images/pdficonarrow.gif) |
View and Print this Publication (233 KB) |
| Publication Notes: |
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable.
|
![[ Get Acrobat ]](/images/getacro.gif) |
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility |