Southern Research Station Headquarters - Asheville, NC
![[Images] Five photos of different landscape](/images/imstr1.jpg "[Images] Five photos of different landscape")
Publication Information
| Title: | Recovery of stream ecosystem metabolism from historical agriculture |
|---|---|
| Author(s): | McTammany, M.E.; Benfield, E.F.; Webster, J.R. |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Source: | J.N. Am. Benthol. Soc., Vol. 26(3): 532-545 |
| Description: | Agriculture has influenced southern Appalachian streams for centuries, but recent socioeconomic trends in the region have led to extensive reforestation agricultural land. Stream ecosystem metabolism might recover from agricultural influence as watersheds undergo reforestation, particularly when shade from terrestrial vegetation is restored. We determined historical (1950) and current (1993) forest cover in 2nd - and erd -order watersheds in 4 counties of the southern Appalachians using geographic information system. Streams were placed into landuse categories based on % forested land cover in watersheds and riparian zones. Categories included forested (FOR; < 98% forested) and 3 levels of agriculture (AG; ranging from 95% forest to < 60% forest) with no change in % forest over the past 50y, and 2 levels of recovery from agriculture (REC) indicated by reforestation after land abandonment. We selected 3 streams from each category and measured gross primary production (GPP) and 24h respiration (R24) using a 2-station diurnal O2 change technique and gas releases to determine recreation rates. We calculated net ecosystem production (NEP) and the ratio of GPP to Ra (P/R) to compare ecosystem energetics among landuse categories. We measured nutrient concentrations, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), temperature (degree-days), suspended particle concentrations, and benthic algae (chlorophyll a and ash-free dry mass) to determine if these factors were affected by current or historical agriculture and were correlated with metabolism. Concentrations of inorganic nutrients, PAR, degree-days, suspended solids, and benthic algae were significantly higher in AG streams than in FOR streams. Nutrient and suspended solid concentrations also were higher in REC than in FOR streams. Nutrient and suspended solid concentrations also were higher in REC than in FOR streams, but PAR, degree-days, and benthic algae were similar in REC and FOR streams. GPP varied from <0.1 g O2 m-2d-1 in FOR streams to 1.0 g O2 M-2d-1 in AG streams. GPP was similar in REC and FOR streams, suggestion that shading caused by reforestation might reduce GPP to pre-agricultural levels. R24 was 4 to 20x greater than GPP in all stream types, resulting in highly negative NEP. NEP was less negative in AG streams than in FOR and REC streams. Negative NEP and P/R consistently <1 could have been caused by allochthonous organic matter from remnant forested degree-days, and algal biomass, suggesting that reduced light limited primary production in the streams studied. R24 was positively correlated with nutrient concentrations. Shading caused by reforestation appears to be an important mechanism by which stream metabolism recovers from historical agriculture. Our results provide support for stream restoration efforts focused on developing and maintaining streamside forests. |
 |
View and Print this Publication (2.71 MB) |
| Pristine Version: | An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here: View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (2.36 MB) | Publication Notes: |
|
![[ Get Acrobat ]](/images/getacro.gif){kind=small} |
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility |
