Title:	Properties of bio-based medium density fiberboard
Author(s):	Lee, Sangyeob; Shupe, Todd F.; Hse, Chung Y.
Date:	2006
Source:	In: Recent Developments in Wood Composites: 51-58
Description:	In order to utilize agricultural waste fibers as an alternative resource for composites, a number of variables were investigated to determine whether the mechanical and physical properties of agro-based fiberboard could be improved. Fibers were classified into four different mesh sizes and used to evaluated the effect of fiber size on the mechanical and physical properties of the composite. Moisture content (MC) of the furnish and additional moisture from the resin applications were significant factors influencing the mechanical properties of the composites. Medium density fiberboard (MDF) made from bagasse fibers with 8 percent MC had a 63-percent increase in modulus of rupture (MOR) and a 30-percent increase in modulus of elasticity (MOE) compared to composites manufactured with 0 percent MC furnish. For bagasse MDF, a compounded resin system of 1 percent urea-formaldehyde (UF) performed as well as panels with 4.5 percent MDI in MOR and 3.5 percent MDI in MOE. Internal bond (IB) test results also showed that the modified resin system had slightly lower IB strength than with 4.5 percent MDI. Static bending and tensile strength parallel- and perpendicular-to-the surface increased as fiber aspect ratios increased from 3 to 20. Fiber bundles (11% of weight fraction, > 40 mesh) and particles smaller than 80 mesh size were responsible for the mechanical property loss of agro-based composites. Hardboard appeared to be the most promising panel type based on compatibility and property enhancement. Two mixing combinations (50/50 and 25/75) of bagasse/tallow tree fibers yielded mechanical and physical properties which statistically differed insignificantly from higher proportions of Sapium fibers and provided maximum utilization of bagasse fibers into the panels.
	View and Print this Publication (0.98 MB)
Pristine Version:	An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here: View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (1.14 MB)
Publication Notes:	We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information. This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable.
	Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility