Browse Units


Contact Information

Southern
Research Station

200 W.T. Weaver Blvd.
Asheville, NC
28804-3454
(828) 257-4832
(828) 259-0503 TTY

Publication Information

Bookmark and Share Mail this page   Evaluate this publication  

Title: A comparison of three methods for classifying fuel loads in the Southern Appalachian Mountains
Author(s): Brudnak, Lucy; Waldrop, Thomas A.; Rideout-Hanzak, Sandra
Date: 2006
Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-92. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 514-517
Description: As the wildland-urban interface in the Southern Appalachian Mountains has grown and become more complex, land managers, property owners, and ecologists have found it increasingly necessary to understand factors that drive fuel loading. Few predictive fuel loading models have been created for this important region. Three approaches to estimating fuel loads are compared here. Community type, landscape position, and disturbance may all affect fuel loading, but no prior studies have compared them as predictors of fuel loading. The Landscape Ecosystem Classification system uses information about landform, vegetation, and soils to identify distinct forest community types. Slope position and aspect also contribute to the effects of topography on forest community types. Finally, disturbance type is discussed in the context of its contribution to fuel accumulation. Using discriminant analysis, we found significant differences in resubstitution success rates among the methods. However, the vectors of discriminating fuel variables for these methods are similar, indicating the importance of ericaceous fuels in the Southern Appalachian Mountains.
View and Print this Publication (165 KB)
Publication Notes: We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable.
 [ Get Acrobat ] Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility