Park Access and Environmental Equity

 Forest Service Researcher Looks at Changing Demographics in the South

When the term “environmental justice” or “equity” is used, most people think of the siting of environmental hazards, but environmental justice also includes questions about access to environmental goods. For those who live in towns and cities, access to parks is one such environmental good. Little is known about the supply of such goods for Latinos who’ve moved into areas of the South where there have previously been few Latinos.

Cassandra Johnson-Gaither, research social scientist with the Southern Research Station Integrating Human and Natural Systems unit, recently examined Latino and other social groups’ access to parks in Hall County, GA, one of the “new destination” counties for Latinos.

 “Since 1990, Latinos migrated or immigrated to nontraditional areas of the South—basically states other than Florida—in unprecedented numbers, with Latino populations in some states increasing 300 or 400 percent,” says Johnson Gaither. “These trends have transformed longstanding black-white communities into black-white-Latino communities now struggling with cultural change.”

Johnson-Gaither chose Hall County, which includes the town of Gainesville, GA, as typical of the areas in the South where Latinos are now moving. “There are very few studies of Latino communities’ access to parks in these new destination areas,” says Johnson-Gaither. “This is an important issue for urban foresters, park managers, and city planners since urban parks may be the only natural resource available to newly settled lower income residents who may not own cars or have access to good public transportation.”

Using data from the U.S. Census, Johnson-Gaither mapped out where Latinos lived in Hall County, GA. To determine whether Latinos had equitable access to parks, she first estimated the mean number of all Hall County residents living within walking distance (a quarter mile) of park entrances. Then she compared walking distance to park entrances among different social groups.

“On average, there were more whites compared to either Latinos or African Americans living within short walking distance of a park,” says Johnson-Gaither. “However, in Hall County, Latinos now live in areas that used to be working class white communities that, historically, also did not have as much access to parks as the more affluent, mostly white communities in other parts of the county.”

Johnson-Gaither’s study is one of the first of its kind in the South. Census-track-based information from studies like this can help municipal and county planners develop strategies to address the relative lack of park access in Latino communities, which tend to be in higher density areas of towns.

“Strategies could include converting land from existing uses or establishing land sharing initiatives with schools and churches,” says Johnson-Gaither. “The larger and arguably more important task, however, is for city leaders and community organizers to find ways to engage Latino and other minority communities in the process of increasing the acreage of parks accessible to them.”

 Access the full text of the research article.

Share
Categories: Forest Recreation, Forest Values, Journal Article | Tags: , , , , | Comments Off

CAFMS Hosts Smoke in the Mountains Workshop

Grandfather Mountain Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest

Smoke Management in the Southern Appalachians

February 28, 2012, 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

Bent Creek Training Facility, Asheville, NC

Organized by the Consortium of Appalachian Fire Managers and Scientists (CAFMS), this course will examine some of the challenges faced when trying to manage smoke in mountainous terrain. A primary focus will be highlighting the differences between managing smoke in the Coastal Plain versus the mountains. Participants will explore a range of tools available to assist land managers with managing smoke and spend some time examining case studies of smoke management gone wrong. The primary focus of this workshop is not on specific training on using any one tool, but rather on improving understanding of smoke management and the factors that can contribute to undesirable smoke management outcomes.

Registration is limited to 40 participants. Register online here.  

.

Share
Categories: Event, Forest Restoration and Management | Tags: , , | Comments Off

An Evening Burn to Restore Mountain Forests

Prescribed fires were set on the Green River Game Land in the early evening of January 31 as a part of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study.

The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) and the Southern Research Station(SRS) have been cooperating for over 10 years to study prescribed burning in the Southern Appalachian Mountains on state-owned Green River Game Land in Polk County, NC. 

The afternoon and evening of January 31, crews burned study plots on the Green River Game Land site for the third time since 2003. Fire crews from the Forest Service, NCWRC, and the North Carolina Forest Service ignited ridges and fire lines to produce cool and slow-moving backing fires throughout the 60-acre study area.  Crew members worked through the night to make sure that the fire was completely out. 

The study, part of the National Fire and Fire Surrogates Study originally funded by the National Fire Plan and the Joint Fire Science Program, is currently supported by the SRS Center for Forest Disturbance Science.  It is the only study that follows changes to many parts of the Appalachian ecosystem through multiple prescribed fires. 

“We’ve studied changes to vegetation, fuels, soils, effects on tree diseases and insects, and many different animals,” says Tom Waldrop, principal investigator and leader of the SRS Fire Sciences Team. “We’ve also studied public response to prescribed burning. These forests are resilient to fire, so the changes we’ve measured are small so far.”

The goal of the cooperative study is to restore Green River Game Land sites to open woodland condition. Waldrop emphasizes that very few management goals can be reached with a single fire.  Since national funding ended in 2008, the study has been downsized and limited to fewer variables, but SRS researchers continue to measure vegetation and fuels while NCWRC continues to monitor birds. –Tom Waldrop

Results from the Green River Game Land study have been published in many journals; some are highlighted on the Consortium of Appalachian Fire Managers and Scientists (CAFMS) website.

Read a recent study on reptile and amphibian response to fuel reduction including prescribed burning on the study area at http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/36863 .

Share
Categories: Forest Restoration and Management, Upland Hardwoods Ecology and Management | Tags: , , | Comments Off